Try this guy. He’s spent his life studying, tracking and fighting these diseases.
Try this guy. He’s spent his life studying, tracking and fighting these diseases.
Many people also don’t realize Biden has a stutter. People who stutter often can mask it but it uses a lot of mental focus. This would detract from their overall speaking ability.
Australia (1794 deaths)
Nah. Currently 898 deaths. 349 Active cases and 19 new cases.
The 19 new is a significant jump over the past fortnight's figures unfortunately. But the second wave in Victoria seems to be subsiding.
But yeah we've had generally sound state and federal Covid management, excellent economic relief and social security - Medical officers' advice has been strictly adhered to and we have universal free health care.
Basically everything America hasn't.
It’s all political bullshit You know it. I know it.
Oh, I misread the data. Thanks for the clarification. I accidentally mistook the Aus total for a Territory like Victoria and added them together.
As long as I have you, can you do another fact check? Is this how Australians really feel?
I think too specific and a little heavy on the schadenfreude for most.
I'd say more it's more a 'general you-are-kidding-me incredulity' with a dose of sympathy for the right-minded citizens.
Also a fair bit of relief that we aren't in your shoes.
A cow and a pig are both mammals but not everything that is true for one is true for the other as an example pigs do not chew their cud.
The fact that other viruses are corona shaped does not mean that they are the same virus.
Your statement that "covid has been around for twenty years" is like suggesting that cows and pigs are the same. Covid-19 is not the same virus as other corona shaped viruses. Covid-19 has been around for less than two years.
If what you said was true then why were those politicians whom you admire caught unprepared. You are actually insulting those you support when you suggest that they did not know in 2017 that this virus was already around. You make it sound like they are incompetent and that they lack vigilance.
Science is all over the place on this plague.
I'm not sure the science is all over the place, but some of the press and politicians are. That article was written by a Rupert Murdoch organization, so might as well read Fox news, which is also owned by Murdoch and known as a primary misinformation vector.
If you read what the scientists wrote and go to WHO's website, they are arguing that lockdowns should not be the primary control of infection, and when they are used they should be short and sharp. The primary controls they recommend are social distancing, masks, avoiding large crowds, ventilating indoor spaces well, and washing hands.
The trouble in America is we politicized some primary controls like mask wearing and distancing, so we ended up with horrendous death rates. Reopening schools and sporting events hasn't worked well because of the high numbers of people (not scientist or doctors) who say there is no coronavirus and it's a myth, and masks don't work.
Remember how the hardest thing in controlling Ebola in Africa was misinformation? Well, Ebola didn't make it here but misinformation did and death followed.
Former Australian Prime Minister has called for a 'Royal Commission' (Senate Inquiry) into News Corp.
One salient paragraph is:
"With politicians running for cover, the Murdoch royal commission is a long shot. But, if it does get up, James Murdoch, Rupert's youngest son, could give evidence, given he has just explained why he "pulled the ripcord" and quit the family firm over editorial direction of Fox News. "A contest of ideas shouldn't be used to legitimise disinformation," he told The New York Times. At "great news organisations", the mission should be "to introduce fact to disperse doubt — not to sow doubt".
There's your witness for the prosecution right there."
- Brisbane Times.
Exactly, when sources are quoted that no one trusts what good are they? News has turned propoganda and sources have turned political. So as to my original point in this thread we must rely on our own common sense. When science tells us that the disease is smaller than a hair and wearing a mask is like trying to stop a mosquito with a chainlink fence we believe them. Because it’s commons sense. But we can extrapolate that common sense further. Touching infected surface then touching your mask infects the mask. Yet everyone touches their mask many many times per day. If a mask is contaminated with a deadly pandemic then why are there no disposal protocols? I see masks all over parking lots. Shouldn’t hazmat be there picking them up? Is it a pandemic at all? It certainly doesn’t come close to the seasonal flu stats. You see we can spin ourselves into the ground with all the contradiction and in the end we realize it has all turned political.
Blue states shutdown, Red states open.
99.6% survival rate and we are all supposed to live in fear. Lakers win and thousands celebrate in the streets while churches are still shut down.
None of this makes any more sense than my own common sense.
Only in America where our death rate is way above the rest of the world are masks very controversial, and even in America they aren't controversial among scientists and doctors.
There are good publications like Nature that show data from scientists who have given decades of their life to this question, and the unequivocal conclusion is masks work:
When science tells us that the disease is smaller than a hair and wearing a mask is like trying to stop a mosquito with a chainlink fence
This is my big beef with the mask. It’s touching the disease and then transferring it. You should only wear a mask once then dispose. The guidance on mask wearing has be horrible.
Common sense is NOT a good way to judge the scientific validity of something. Common sense is what gets so many people to be anti-vax, believe in conspiracies and so much other pseudoscientific nonsense.
It’s touching the disease and then transferring it.
Is it better then to have the disease bypass the mask and directly touch the insides of our noses and mouth? If we touch the mask and the disease transfers to our hands, is that not better than having it in our nose and lungs? We can wash our hands.
Chris, I am a germaphobe. This has been my life. Someone comes in my home, office with a cough or sneeze when they leave out comes the lysol. I hear a sneeze in grocery aisle I go the other way.
So I pull my sleeve down to open doors. I open the ice cream door at the store I pull my sleeve down. I am constantly avoiding germs. I do not touch my face. I do not touch my nose or eyes. Without going into more detail just trust me on this. lol
Masks are germ diapers and to answer your question you cannot touch them without contaminating them. They should never be touched if you touch a germ source. They should be disposed of like hazardous waste because they potentially are. This is why for the everyday person they do not work. Not to mention at all if the disease is airborne it goes right past the mask on exhale.
Develope a mask that seals against the tiny Covid 19 virus do not touch it and contaminate it then we can rethink the mask thing. Until then they are useless.
You’re missing the point and not getting the science right. First off the mask is largely for keeping the mask wearer’s germs from travelling as far as they would without it. In essence protecting others. Yes in a perfect world everyone would not touch their masks, would use an N95 mask and dispose of it every time. The average person touches the mask and face more than they should and hence everyone is encouraged to not just wear a mask but wash their hands or disinfect them regularly. Sounds like you really just don’t want to wear a mask so you’re searching for reasons why you shouldn’t wear one.
Please don’t gaslight. A question would be more suited to the conversation.
The only reason we wear a mask is if we are sick we don’t transfer it to someone else.
Do you disagree?
I’ve already shown that the science is mostly political and is all over the place. Now the WHO agrees with my commons sense. As of yesterday so does the CDC. I’ve also shown that the virus is so small it travels right thru a mask. So upgrade the science of masks where they seal and stop the virus. Then address locking down entire societys. Science is already leaning towards that is an aweful idea. The damage caused is much worse especially for the poor.
Our children are failing school at a 40 to 70% rate. Poor people being hurt the worst.
Taking care and isolating our ederly is a much more common sense approach.
That's the most effective use, but how do you know if you're not sick? It's possible for a person to be contagious without showing any symptoms for two weeks or longer. The responsible thing to do is to wear a mask when you are around other people. The fact that people can still get sick while wearing a mask doesn't mean wearing one has no effect on the spread of the virus.
If that’s the case we will be wearing masks indefinatley. Is that what you propose?
Have you looked at the seasonal flu deaths worldwide?
Chris, I am a germaphobe.
I understand. 🙂 Most people are terrified of germs. 👹
Dunno if you saw, but I have a YouTube channel where I interview prominent doctors, yada, and last week I asked Dr. Klaper what is causing this chart:
You could add Parkinson's, Alzheimer's and Autism to the chart and the trend would be the same, even accelerating after 2000.
I'm in the process of recording a new episode about this chart and what is driving it. There are a half dozen factors but the big three are germophobia, overuse of antibiotics, and eating refined convenience foods.
It's ironic that exposure to animals, dirt, and surfaces like shopping carts, is one of the best ways to develop strong immunity so if we do catch something awful like Covid, it doesn't bring us down.
I‘m getting triggered! Lol
Story: One time I was at a Seahawks game at the Kingdome. The Kingdome had these long metal troughs that everyone would line up and pee into, side by side. Literally 50 people peeing at once. When a spot opened you just filled in the hole. Directly outside the door was a set of stairs leading downward. A distinct pee trail led to these set of stairs. Out I come following the pee trail and here is a young child playing on the stairs her mother standing close by.
AAAAAAAARRRRRGGGG! But you know what? I agree with you 100% eat dirt! Our kids feasted on it. Sucked on dogs ears shared (stole) bottles from sick kids and on and on.
Always in amazement of how tough our God given bodies are.
Wash your hands! Lol
It's not really my proposal, though, is it?
On when to stop wearing masks: 52% suggested more than a year.
“It’s hard to know when it will be the right time to stop face-covering, but given it is such a small inconvenience for notable gains, I find it hard to believe that anyone is in a hurry to end this practice.”
Amy Padula, University of California-San Francisco
Would wait more than a year
“When the coronavirus pandemic is over, and there aren't any other virulent respiratory pathogens circulating, I will consider not wearing a mask in some situations. I will probably always wear a mask on a plane from now on.”
Jean Brender, Texas A&M University
Would wait more than a year