• Log In
  • Sign Up
    • Last evening was an educational experience for the two of us...

      My wife's needs for scanning at work are your basic office-level tasks - those mundane items that really don't require a large dollar scanner.

      Due to the types of scanning needs, she has a sheet-feed scanner. We played around with it a bit - the OEM software really allows for some minimal control over scan resolution. With a couple of old snapshots I have, scan speed was fast, with the corresponding decrease in resolution - understood why that happens.

      Same images, scanned with the ancient OEM hardware and software that I have - not much better.

      I've added the Windows Scan app onto my desktop. "Hey, it'll save as PNG or TIF - great!"

      Scanned a couple of those photos on my ancient scanner at 600dpi, then saved as PNG, with the obvious improvement in resolution. The corresponding speed trade-off concerned my wife "OMG, this is going to take forever!"

      So...why hasn't the big-dogs in the scanner world implemented more USB-3 interfaces at the mid-range or lower-range price points? Just curious as my search last night really didn't show many that were native USB 3 in the under $200 price range.

    • One of the reasons I photograph many prints and documents with a DSLR - not even a full frame one, but an APS-C or even m4/3 DSLR captures files instantaneously, and saves them to the memory card for later transfer to a computer, and delivers a 20-25 Mbit Raw file that offers a fair amount of editing ability in LR.

      Once my camera is on a tripod and my lighting set up, I can shoot frames pretty quickly. The exposure doesn't really change, nor does the color balance. I can alter the size of print I am shooting by rasing or lowering the print on a stack of large books, so I can switch between 2x3 inch prints to 8x11 inch prints pretty quickly. Raising or lowering the print is easier and faster than changing the camera height on a tripod. I use a 50mm Macro lens so it has a nice flat field, focuses closely enough, and is small and light. I use a cable release to minimize any vibrations. And I get better RAW files, faster and easier than with my flat bed scanner.

      I spent a few moments looking through film scanners on B&H, and I can't find one that uses a faster computer connection than USB 2.0. I didn't see one.

      The truth is that the time is spent in aquiring the scan data, the transfer of the data to the computer is really not the limiting factor for a 20 or 30 Mbit file, even on USB 2.0

      What is really needed is a first class proconsumer film scanner for 35mm film, that is fast scanning and of high optical quality, but there seems to be a very limited market for these devices any more. I see lots of cheap ones that are of no interest to me.

      For many folks, Chris's suggestion of a scanning service makes a lot of sense - it requires a modicum of high quality equipment, and a fair understanding of image editing to do well. And can be time consuming.

      I do much of mine in the cold of winter when the snow is blowing about....

    • In the technology closet at my wife's place of employment, there's an un-used Epson Perfection V550 Photo. It'll be coming home tonight.

      Besides VueScan and SilverFast, is there some other software that I should consider for the scanning process itself?

    • Hey @kwthom Thanks to your thread and my need to find a particular Valley Trash photo, I am now knee deep into dragging many of my DVD archived images from 2000-2008 on to my ReadyNAS "cloud". DVD's are so 1990. hahahahahahahah

    • The Epson Perfection V600 scanner looks interesting even if it is USB 2.0 output. The scanner specs are pretty nice, Digital ICE is very worthwhile ( I have a similar ICE on my CoolScan ) and the price is very reasonable. I am sure VueScan supports as well...

    • I've still got about thirty 100mb Zip Drives in a box somewhere. They'll be with the VHS tapes, Vinyl and Audio Cassettes - probably.

    • I have the loaned Epson 550 in my possession 😎 what a boat-anchor! There will be time today to fire it up and have a look at what the native software will do on a few sample images I have here. There may still be the possibility of having two scanners available on this task, still working on that.

    • Update...

      * My wife's work laptop will have a licensed copy of VueScan installed in the next day or two. I'll play with that - and the settings - and see how it compares. I may break down and purchase a license for home use as well.

      * Latest version of Epson Scan seems to do okay. Minimal cleanup (since the 550 doesn't support the Digital ICE) on a couple more images I have here, just working thru what the workflow might be.

      * My BIL estimates 300 images. Less than a handful are larger than 'snapshot' size. We may not get them all done, but there's also some clippings from when he had his 15 minutes of fame, back in the 1960's. Three days; should be able to do it.

      * My last test is to attach the 550 to my laptop. It's not the fastest machine out there, but hope good enough to handle this scanning job - scheduled to happen in three weeks.

    • In addition to photographs, are other printed or hand written documents - hand written letters, drawings, programs guides, etc from our childhood, or from our relatives childhoods.

      I just found a letter my father wrote me in December 25, 1950 to explain why Santa was no longer going to be bringing me Christmas gifts - Santa had to save his time and effort for the younger children of the world - so my parents were going to take over this task for Christmas. My mother had saved this document all her life for me, apparently.

      Scanned very nicely and quickly on my V700 Epson scanner in VueScan. I created a special folder on my external hard drive and VueScan saves the file directly there. The original document paper is degrading with time, but the digital file should store more securely.

      I have been using VueScan for almost 15 years on many different computers. has provided a real service to scan users.

    • Another update:

      * My wife's employer did NOT have a VueScan license (grumble, grumble..), so I played around for a couple of hours with the demo version. Procurement is imminent.

      * I've got a small pile of unrelated photos here that I've been using to establish a workflow. I bounced across this two-part description of this author's workflow. Yes, it's a decade old, but it doesn't seem to be too terribly different than one might use today. I'm finding some of the technical detail toward the end of the first part to be rather useful from the 'why would you do that?' perspective.

      * We've got a family member that does wedding photography as a side gig. So, one might think that she'll have some tips and tricks to pass along when it comes to LR as well.

    • A brief epilogue to this story...

      As I suspected, several hours of reminiscing about the photos on day one. Since my brother-in-law is a dozen years older than my wife, there were plenty of things he knew that my wife didn't. Yet, there were stories of things told to my wife that my BIL didn't know about.

      About 300 images were scanned, I think. The tag-team process worked very well. Image resolution was adjusted as we went. I spot-checked as we went along, but real image manipulation on 14" laptop screens (when used to doing stuff like this on 27" dual monitors) just wasn't going to happen there.

      One of their uncles had also shot some old slides back in the early 1970's; I'd never seen them this small. I did scan a few of these. I had a single uncle (on mom's side of the family) that shot slide film back in the 60's and 70's. It took a bit of effort to figure out how to scan them, but trial and error worked.

      I think there's about a dozen images that will really be worth the restoration efforts - once I get a better understanding of Lightroom.

      In the next week or so, I'll post up a couple of them to share the results.

    • I share your aversion to image editing on 13 or 14 inch laptop screens. Maybe its our age, or something but a 27 or 31 in 4k or 5K monitor is just so much easier and more satisfying to work on.

    • I've not yet started the process, but even with next-to-nothing accomplished during the scan for cleanup, not too bad:

      Grandparent's house c. 1940's - Hammond Rd., Glen Cove, NY

      My wife's uncles c. 1914 - location unknown

      My wife's paternal grandmother c. 1915 - location unknown. The oval shape was original to the photo. The backdrop was remarkable (auto parts?)

      Unknown individual 1971 Florida. The grandparents were some of the original 'snowbirds' of that era, but they stayed with a son that lived there. Obviously, this one has yet to be cleaned up.

      I never met any of these in-laws of mine...but got a glimpse of their lives thru these images and the stories told by my wife and her brother.

    • These images seem small when I click on them - did you choose to upload only small file sizes here on Cake, and have larger ones for your own use? I think you would want bigger image sizes than I see here.

      I like the 2nd and 3rd image - with just a bit of curves to created a bit more contrast they might really snap. The few damaged areas look like they would be easy to restore too.

      Oval framing was common in the late 19th and early 20th century. I have some images in that format as well.

    • I love these, @kwthom . Here is a quick conversion (hope you don't mind!) of your wife's uncle on the pony. I have nearly the same photo of my father-in-law. I will have to scan it! Looking forward to seeing your restorations.