Cake
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
    • Are manufacturers contributing to litter and waste and also impeding recycling efforts?

      "But one approach to recycling that many of these companies do not support has proved to actually work: container deposit laws, more commonly known as bottle bills, which cost them lots of money.

      In the 10 states where consumers can collect a few cents when they return an empty bottle or can, recycling rates for those containers are often significantly higher. In some cases, they are more than twice as high as in states without such deposits.

      For decades, beverage companies, retailers and many of the nonprofit groups they control have fought to kill bottle bill proposals across the country — with great success. Since 1987, only one state, Hawaii, has passed a bottle bill. This year, such measures have been proposed in at least eight states. Nearly all have been rejected or failed to gain traction.

      The result? Recycling in much of the country still depends almost entirely on the good will of consumers to place their used containers in a bin for pickup. The process is convenient, but means millions of bottles and cans head straight to a dump instead."

      California has had a bottle bill for several years and it seems to be working well. Folks are pretty diligent about recycling even if they don't care about getting their money back. And I see folks picking up litter that will get them money back.

    • While talking recently with someone living in a rural area, they mentioned such small towns are ending recycling programs due to costs and efforts involved. Perhaps the solution would be identifying some environment friendly materials in place of the plastic or even glass currently used. I know that's a far fetched idea when cutting costs is prioritized..