• Log In
  • Sign Up
    • Oh, certainly. Some of the early online DIY publisher platforms (Lulu and iUniverse come to mind) had a rough time but they stuck it out and now there are dozens of selling outlets for authors. One of the problems back then was getting your book reviewed in papers and magazines. Most reviewers would not accept self-published titles. Now, authors don’t need that type of boost to announce or lend credibility to their work. Self-marketing is as easy as selling directly to your social media followers, who are already receptive to your thesis.

    • Last year I bought a self-published book by Richard Saul Wurman, the founder of TED. It’s huge and has AMAZING production value with full color charts and photos everywhere. It’s one of the best books I’ve ever owned. Every publisher turned Richard down despite his fame and the quality of the book, so he printed 5,000 copies and sent them to Amazon, where it gets great reviews and sells.

      (👆 I learned all that from talking to Richard.)

      I suppose the fall of printing costs and the extra margin he gets by not going through a publisher made the amazing color pages possible? Why would the publisher turn him down? Not mass market enough?

    • Looks fascinating! I can see this is a large-format book with lots of photos and they are always more expensive to produce than a standard 6x9 trade book. Just off the top of my head, I’d say he spent at least $12/copy for printing, paper, binding and shipping. Plus it has 708 pages! He’s selling the book for $45. A publisher would have to sell it for double that to make a profit.

      It’s hard to say why he was turned down, but there are many reasons why a book is rejected. This could be because a similar book is already on the publisher's list, the production costs are too high vs. the number of books they can guarantee will sell, or simply because their acquisition pipeline is full. I know many publishers who will not consider a book if you can’t personally guarantee you can sell at least 5,000 copies. They want to see your mailing lists, followers, pre-sales… proof of your audience.

    • It's sort of sad to hear books described as ancient technology, but I get it.

      I think books are evergreen and I hope we never stop making them! In “Game of Thrones” Sam works at the Citadel with all of that knowledge confined to one place. It would be a horrible future if we allowed only certain people access to books or if books became obsolete. The comeback probably has to do with wanting a detox as the author points out, plus the cost to produce books is reduced, access to publishing and selling tools are at our fingertips, more people are using books as calling cards, the economy is improving so people have more disposable income… but I agree it's simply because books are the antithesis of screens.

    • And the antitheses of 256-character tweets interrupting us all day? The NYT said a book is the only thing that allows so sweeping a narrative.