Cake
  • Sign Up
  • Log In
    • jasoncrawford

      I recently finished Steven Pinker's new book, Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress. I highly recommend it.

      The theme is contained in its subtitle: it is that reason, science and humanism lead to progress. The corollary is: keep it up!

      I wrote a summary here: http://rootsofprogress.org/enlightenment-now. There's also a good review by Scott Aaronson here: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3654

      Would love to hear whether others have read it, and what people think!

    • kikoteixeira

      I am reading it now

    • cvdavis

      Good summary. His argument is not a new one but the first I've heard of for a whole book. Pinker and his work is a gentler version of the new atheism or so it would appear from your summary. Sounds like a good book but the anti-religious aspect makes it less palatable for the masses. I'm an atheist and science teacher and I'm on Pinker's 'side' so I hope his book is widely influencial.

    • fpianka

      I have a few Pinker books I poke through now and then and seem to find great points to ponder in each, but haven’t got “ENow” yet. Just learned recently that Pinker is Canadian. (This is my first “serving of cake!”)

    • Ri

      As in his previous Better Angels of our Nature, he provides ample empirical evidence to support what may seem to be a counterintuitive thesis, namely that seen from a 20,000 foot view, the world is getting better over time, and this is entirely due to embracing reason, science and humanism. Problems remain, but our best hope of solving them is to continue applying these enlightenment values.

      It's an ambitious book, and so there are some things that I didn't agree with. I do think that he glossed over the threat of climate change a bit. Though he certainly acknowledges it, he seems to be putting a little too much faith in geoengineering to save the day. He also addresses the question of why it seems that everything is getting worse, not better, but I wasn't persuaded his explanation was sufficient. While generally well measured, he sometimes says provocative things ("Intellectuals who call themselves 'progressive' really hate progress.") only to back off a bit later. Still, on balance, I think Pinker is always worth reading, and this was no exception.

    Discover More Conversations

    Message
    You've been invited!
    Log in or sign up to post