Cake
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
    • I don’t see the point of arguing on anything when it is the attack on someone’s credentials but not the actual information presented.

      I linked to multiple websites that detailed specific problems with the actual information presented in Tatyana Obukhanych's anti-vaccination writings, including in the book you recommended.

      I also acknowledged Obukhanych's credentials as an immunologist, as did the sources I linked to. Her credentials as an immunologist are not in dispute. But her claims are widely disputed, including by other immunologists.

    • I don’t see the point of arguing on anything when it is the attack on someone’s credentials but not the actual information presented.

      But the statements any random person makes need to be weighed by how credible they are. If you are not doing that, the whole thing becomes a numbers game "won" by whatever side is more stubborn.