Cake
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
    • This illustrates one of the fallacies of the argument that "abridging the freedom of speech" includes the freedom of all forms of "expression".

      A photograph of anything other than words is not "speech" regardless of what the courts have stated.

      However, I also do not believe that you are obligated as a private company to provide me a platform for the espousal of my beliefs. Congress is prohibited from making laws which prevent me from saying what I may choose to say or printing at my own expense and distributing by my own labor that which I desire to say. But no printing company is obligated to print what I desire to say. No publisher is obligated to distribute what I desire to communicate. And no internet platform should be forced to allow me to post articles which they do not choose to "host."