ChrisJenkins

Well, if there was a person based interest follow, like G+'s Collections, that would be adequate, I'd think. For someone I wanted to hear absolutely everything from, I could just subscribe to all of them.

Given the fast and dirty rip out of G+ as a centralized Google identity layer after Vic Gundotra left (which was a massive mistake, IMO), I'm sure the problem was half brain drain, and half technical debt. I'd hate to see the Kanban board for that …

One of the things I like about having a dev driven team now is that I spend most of my time focused on architecture and devops, and let the developer leads take the reins on testing new approaches for how we build product. That lets them taste the …

Kudos are due to Facebook for investing in Hack which showed how much faster and more scalable PHP architecture could be. 7.x takes a lot of that to heart, and solves a ton of issues that OOP devs complained about for years.

I've found much of Gary V's advice to be suitable only for Gary V.

The Golden Rice thing always kills me. Every time I see another fear mongering post about GMOs that doesn't differentiate between Roundup Ready Corn and other GMOs, I grind my teeth. Monsanto has certainly done the field no favors.

I <3 this post so much. I always love knowing about the guts. MySQL may be old, but you get predictability, and massive amounts of already solved problems with that. It scaled Facebook to 100MM users, so I figure it will work just fine for …

I still feel like Following a person is a necessary function. Google+ got it right on that front...follow a person's topics, or circle them for everything. Then browse hash tags for topics on a post.

Sorry to resurrect this necropost, but for people I know, I absolutely want to follow every post they make, because they may post on a variety of topics that I want to engage with them on. Maybe a "subscribe" function or similar would be great, I …

As much as I love Google (and believe me, that love goes deep), they are absolutely TERRIBLE at product management and marketing. Take Hangouts, for instance: - Comes out as an integration with Google+, and introduces the concept of public video …

Yeah, he was part of a circle of marketers that I got sucked into, which is how I met cool folks like David Kutcher and Mark Traphagen.

Gideon Rosenblatt put this out, and I agree with every word. I think it's an important case study for social, and for Cake specifically. https://www.the-vital-edge.com/fall-of-google-plus/

Have you never seen water cooled systems?

*laughing* Seriously though, hearing you'd joined Cake caused a massive burst of enthusiasm for the platform.

AMA isn't like copyrighted or anything, is it?

I mean, if you're qualified...

Yep, I get that.

It actually works pretty good, but it's not mainstream in the way that Facebook is. However, I'm putting some thought into where to migrate these groups, and that's probably going to be the best option.

The only downside to that is that groups similar to what I host on Facebook aren't going to want to congregate on a more socialized version of Erome.com. They just want to be able to have open conversations and share nude selfies occasionally. Not …

The side effect of that, of course, is a market gap that ShareSome.com is quickly exploiting.

So, it seems Twitter is the only platform where you can't get flagged for showing a nude human body. I'm part of two different groups on Facebook that discuss human sexuality. 18+, and set to secret. According to FB's up and coming policy on …

The real question, though: will you allow NSFW posts and topics?

Absolutely one of my favorite all time films.

Solid advice!

It absolutely did. In fact, Victoria's AMAs did much to lift Reddit's reputation as a hive of scum and villainy into a serious platform where even the President took the time.